Documents cross-examined
The claim, the approval, the receipt and the policy are read against each other.
Diligence reads the rule and the evidence side by side — claims against approvals, declarations against records, sign-offs against delegated limits — and shows you where behaviour departs from your own internal rules. Across every case, not a sample of thirty.
You have a rule on expense limits, one on approvals, one on gifts, one on personal trading. Whether staff actually follow them is checked once a year, by pulling thirty cases and reading them by hand. The other few thousand are never opened. And a breach only shows up when someone puts the claim, the approval, the receipt and the policy side by side — four documents, one at a time.
We sample thirty cases a year and hope they are representative.
The breach is only visible if you read the claim next to the approval.
We find out someone broke the policy eleven months after they did.
We can't put staff records through a public AI tool.
cases actually reviewed while the rest are never opened.
a breach can sit unnoticed between annual reviews.
risk breaching laws because of the limited sample size
Behind Diligence, AI agents read the rule and the evidence together — claims against approvals, declarations against records, sign-offs against delegated limits — across every case rather than a sample.
Learn more about DiligenceThe claim, the approval, the receipt and the policy are read against each other.
AI helps your team review a larger sample more efficiently.
Ensure information security with a private deployment on your own premises
Compliance, second-line risk, internal audit, HR and control owners.
Policy versions, staff acknowledgement and attestation — then testing whether day-to-day behaviour matches the rule actually in force.
A clear record of who is bound by which rule, and who is following it.
Claims, invoices, approvals and sign-offs cross-examined against internal limits, across the whole population rather than a sample.
Breaches found as soon as possible.
Gift and entertainment logs, outside-interest and personal-trading declarations, and access rights tested against the rules staff signed up to.
Consistent conduct oversight without sending staff data off-site.
| CHECK | WHAT DILIGENCE FLAGS |
|---|---|
| Approval missing | UNAPPROVEDAn action taken with no sign-off on file. |
| Over delegated limit | EXCEEDSApproved by someone without the authority for that amount or decision. |
| Policy not acknowledged | UNACKNOWLEDGEDStaff in scope who never acknowledged the rule they are held to. |
| Document contradictions | MISMATCHThe claim, the receipt and the approval do not agree with each other. |
| Undeclared interests | UNDECLAREDGifts, outside interests or personal trades that policy required to be declared. |
| Overdue remediation | OVERDUEAn exception past its due date, weighted by the risk it carries. |
| Coverage gaps | UNCOVEREDA rule with no check behind it, or staff no check currently reaches. |
Each result links back to the evidence it was drawn from.
All AI diagnosis can be edited by control by your team.
A continuous record, in the form a board or auditor expects.
Full activity log, complete audit trail, and a private version you can deploy on your own premises.
Claims, approvals and declarations are compared against the rule in force across the whole population — and it runs inside our own network, with a log of every check.
Diligence supports policy management and governance, operational-risk and control assessments, and cybersecurity and operational-resilience assurance. It helps teams organise evidence, assess gaps, manage approvals, and track remediation.
Diligence can support policy drafting, version control, review and approval routing, employee attestation, and comparisons between policies and relevant regulatory or framework requirements. It provides a clearer record of which policies are current, approved, and acknowledged.
Yes. When obligations are mapped to policies and controls, Diligence can help identify documents that may need review following a regulatory update. This allows policy owners to prioritise updates and preserve evidence of governance actions.
Diligence can guide control assessments, collect and review evidence, identify weaknesses, support risk and gap scoring, generate remediation recommendations, and track action plans. This helps teams focus attention on recurring, material, or overdue control issues.
Yes. It can map cybersecurity and operational-resilience frameworks to internal policies and controls, organise evidence, conduct gap checks, and support assessment and reporting workflows across multiple frameworks or jurisdictions.
No. Diligence is designed to strengthen structured review and governance processes, not remove accountability. Control owners, risk teams, compliance professionals, and approvers remain responsible for validating assessments, exercising judgement, and making final decisions.
Tell us which policies matter most and we'll show you what the documents say.